Although our universe and beyond has perhaps been pondered since the
beginning of time, a real inquiry began with the Babylonians about 4000
years ago. They were very skilled astronomers, able to predict the apparent
motions of the moon, stars, and planets, and even eclipses. But the
first civilization known to build a cosmological model to interpret
these motions was the ancient Greeks. In the fourth century BC, they
came up with the idea that the stars were fixed on a celestial sphere
which rotated about the spherical earth every 24 hours, and the planets,
the Sun and the Moon, moved in the region between the Earth and stars.
This model of the solar system was further developed in the next few
hundred years, resulting in the second century AD with Ptolemy's system.
Ptolemy thought that perfect motion should be in circles, thus the stars
and planets moved in perfect, heavenly, circles. But, to account for
the complicated motion of the planets, which appeared to loop back upon
themselves, epicycles (see here)
had to be used so that the planets moved in circles about the fixed
earth.
Ptolemy's model was complicated, but very successful at reproducing
the apparent motion of the planets. When Copernicus in the sixteenth
century proposed a system with the planets revolving around the sun,
instead of Ptolemy's earth-centered system, he could not match the accuracy
of Ptolemy's system, even though his system was much closer to the correct
motion of the planetary system. Copernicus was therefore widely rejected,
even by the greatest astronomer of the time, Tycho Brahe. His theory
was only accepted in the early seventeenth century after the invention
of the telescope and the discovery by Galileo that moons orbited Jupiter,
and therefore, it was quite possible for planets to orbit the sun. Also,
Tycho Brahe's assistant Kepler discovered the key to building an earth-centered
model. He discovered the planets moved in ellipses, not perfect circles.
It was after this discovery that it became evident that the stars must
be a long distance from the sun, because it was settled that the earth
was orbiting the sun, and if the earth were fixed, we would not see
the relative position of the stars change. It was therefore settled
that the universe was a large sea of stars, each very far away from
each other Galileo affirmed this by discovering thousands of unseen
stars using a telescope. It was Isaac Newton that concluded that the
universe must be infinite and full of stars, each a lot like our sun.
An approximate distance was not measured until the nineteenth century.
A majority of the visible stars in the sky are in the Milky Way, our
galaxy. However, were there then other galaxies like ours? This was
not known at all until in the 1920's when American astronomer Hubble
established that the fuzzy patches of light wondered about by astronomers
were galaxies like ours. Hubble also discovered that these galaxies
looked like they were moving away from us, with velocities proportional
to their distance. Along with Albert Einstein's theory of relativity,
this affirmed that the universe is expanding. It was discovered like
this: Einstein proposed his theory in 1915, part of which showed that
matter tends to fall together under gravity, making a steady universe
impossible. Instead of realizing this, Einstein included an arbitrary
constant which became known as the "cosmological constant",
that could balance the gravitational force and keep the galaxies apart.
Einstein, when he later learned that the universe is indeed expanding,
considered the cosmological constant his greatest mistake. In 1917,
the mathematician Friedmann realized Einstein's equations could describe
an expanding universe, and discovered the solution indicated that all
matter was born at one instant in the past, and now was moving away
from us. A critic of this theory, British astronomer Fred Hoyle, called
it a "Big Bang", and the name stuck with it.
Although this "Big Bang" is widely accepted among astronomers
and cosmologists today, there is an alternate model proposed by Hoyle
and some of his colleagues, called the Steady State theory, which attempts
to explain this expansion without a beginning of time. This seemed very
acceptable at the time, however, in 1965 two astronomers named Penzias
and Wilson discovered a cosmic microwave background radiation, and it
was interpreted as a faint aftermath of the intense radiation of the
hot Big Bang, which was predicted in 1949. This hot Big Bang has become
well accepted since the 1970's, but still raises many questions and
problems among scientists. Hundreds of questions also arose out of this
theory, such as how the galaxies formed out of primordial expansion,
what the universe is mostly made up of, the shape of the universe, and
many more. Out of these discoveries and theories rose a huge interest
in the physics of our universe, sparking new ideas and theories, and
well as revisions of old theories.
And so here we are today, in the most scientific age in history. Knowledge
of our universe is growing rapidly, but we have barely scratched the
surface. Who knows what is out there, waiting to be discovered?
Click on links to go to other pages on this site: