Paper Airfoil Aerodynamics5 - Airfoil Design
Considerations and More on the Reynolds Number | |
I.
A. Next B. Back
A number of considerations must be made when designing airfoils. Usually it is cost prohibitive to design and test full sized airfoils in the laboratory. This is why it is usually desirable to test scale models of the wing in a wind tunnel. Strangely, we have
shown that the drag forces generated by a wing are dependent partly on the
length the air must travel to cross it. In a scale model the width of the
wing is much different than in a full scale model. This means that the drag forces
would not be scalar if we simply tested the model at the same
airspeed. A principle of the
Reynolds number allows for the testing of scale models in flight to
accurately predict their behavior at full size and speed. It can be said that two wings are
dynamically similar if they are the similar in shape and operate at
the same Reynolds number. For instance, assume we have a small, scale model of a Cessna aircraft wing that is 1/10 the width of an ordinary wing. In order to compensate and achieve the same Reynolds number we must increase the speed of airflow by ten times. For this particular reason, it is fairly clear that scale models of most airplanes suffer performance degradations as they decrease in size. Figure 5.1 and 5.2 show another example of the scaling problems encountered during scale model testing. The next wave of aircraft
research aims to produce miniature planes that can be mistaken for birds
or insects. -- Popular Mechanics - August
1997 Figure 5.3 shows an example of what such a micro air vehicle could look like in the future. Additional design problems are involved when construction materials such as paper or canvas are used to construct airfoils. In the next section, I will discuss some of these design considerations. I.
A. Next B. Back |
Figure 5.1 and 5.2 ? Scaling in applications where
airflow is involved isn?t as straight forward as it would seem at first
glance.
Figure 5.3 -- The future of micro-air vehicles? |