Ever
wonder: how that giant flame generates force? Or if you could simply
build a huge fire underneath the shuttle to make it fly? Well it turns out that
the rocket idea stem from one of newton's revelations. His second law says that
for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Well, in this case
the combustion is the action that excites the oxidized fuel particles away from
the shuttle. The little particles exert the same amount of force on the shuttle
as it did on them. This reaction force is the is what blasts the shuttle away.
A giant fire underneath the shuttle would simply heat up the ship because the
rocket would not be sending anything away to push back on it. One could also
look at this situation as a conservation of momentum situation. The momentum
of the rocket fuel system is zero relative to Earth's surface before the launch.
After the launch the momentums of the ship and the fuel are equal and opposite.
The fuel is going much faster but actually this is because the ship is pulling
earth along with it (by a small amount) because of the gravitational pull between
the rocket and the Earth. Another, more familiar way to think of it is that
the reaction force has to overcome the downward force of gravity on the shuttle.
Source Picture F
Space
Travel
More Sauce
Source Picture D
Liquid injected fueling systems
for rockets:
Source Picture E
Warning: Your
solid fuel engine is about to explode! That is the second
weakness of the solid fuel rocket.
Because it is a solid, it has the ability
to crack while the liquid fuel engine
does not. In a rocket without a crack
in its solid fuel, the excited fuel
particles are ejected more or less
in a perpendicular fashion from
the still cool (relatively) fuel as shown to
the right. In this safe situation
the reaction force on the rocket is in
the direction of the un burnt solid
rocket fuel. This is OK because
the shuttle is designed very specifically
to feel force in this direction.
A crack in the fuel creates more
surface area for the fuel to burn
only now the surfaces are facing
each other and the wall of the
rocket housing. This is not good
because the ejected particles of fuel
not only cause a reaction force
in the direction of the rocket casing,
they also collide into the other
wall creating more force in the wall
direction. Since the forces are
opposing and the walls of the rocket
are not designed for force in that
direction the tendency is for the
rocket to break apart. This can
be catastrophic because as the rocket
breaks apart the exposed surface
area grows a huge amount and